|
Metering of water supply is usually motivated by one or several of four objectives: First, it provides an incentive to conserve water which protects water resources (environmental objective). Second, it can postpone costly system expansion and saves energy and chemical costs (economic objective). Third, it allows a utility to better locate distribution losses (technical objective). Fourth, it allows to charge for water based on use, which is perceived by many as the fairest way to allocate the costs of water supply to users. Metering is considered good practice in water supply and is widespread in developed countries, except for the United Kingdom. In developing countries it is estimated that half of all urban water supply systems are metered and the tendency is increasing. Water meters are read by one of several methods: the water customer writes down the meter reading and mails in a postcard with this info to the water department; the water customer writes down the meter reading and uses a phone dial-in system to transfer this info to the water department; the water customer logs into the website of the water supply company, enters the address, meter ID and meter readings [7] a meter reader comes to the premise and enters the meter reading into a handheld computer; the meter reading is echoed on a display unit mounted to the outside of the premise, where a meter reader records them; a small radio is hooked up to the meter to automatically transmit readings to corresponding receivers in handheld computers, utility vehicles or distributed collectors a small computer is hooked up to the meter that can either dial out or receive automated phone calls that give the reading to a central computer system. Most cities are increasingly installing Automatic Meter Reading (AMR) systems to prevent fraud, to lower ever-increasing labor and liability costs and to improve customer service and satisfaction. |
About us|Jobs|Help|Disclaimer|Advertising services|Contact us|Sign in|Website map|Search|
GMT+8, 2015-9-11 22:05 , Processed in 0.413082 second(s), 16 queries .
